.jpg)
It’s true—migrating your repositories and DevOps processes to GitHub is a key step toward improving collaboration, traceability, and team efficiency.
However, a poorly planned migration can lead to code errors, team conflicts, and even security issues.
While there’s no magic formula for success, at CleverIT we understand that knowing the most common challenges—and how to prevent them—is crucial for planning a smooth and secure transition.
In this article, we explore six frequent challenges when migrating to GitHub, along with best practices to overcome them.
A GitHub migration can fail without leadership buy-in. This often results in limited resources, low priority, and resistance to change among development teams.
Best practices:
This is a more technical challenge. During migration, historical commits may become corrupted, affecting project traceability and integrity.
What to do:
Use specialized tools to detect issues and decide the best approach for each case.
GitHub imposes limits on file sizes, and repositories containing heavy binaries can cause performance issues or increase storage costs when accumulated in large numbers.
Our recommendation:
Poorly configured permissions during migration can lead to security risks and governance problems.
We suggest:
Inconsistent repository names, unclear branch rules, and disorganized code protection policies can make GitHub management difficult.
To prevent this:
If critical dependencies or artifacts are left out during migration, builds and deployments may fail.
Recommended practices:
Migrating to GitHub is not just a technical task—it requires planning, coordination, and strategic vision. That’s what we always emphasize to our clients.
By understanding these challenges and anticipating them, you can ensure a smoother, safer, and more efficient transition—especially when working with an experienced partner like CleverIT.
Planning for problems before they arise is always the best strategy for a successful GitHub migration.